ITP-quantumseminare

itp-quantumseminare@lists.phys.ethz.ch

2 participants
1384 discussions

Start a nNew thread

No QIT seminar next week
by Ladina Hausmann 29 Nov '24

29 Nov '24

Hi all, there is no QIT seminar planned for next week. Best, Ladina

1 0

Monday's QIT seminar in HIT K 52 at 14:00
by Ladina Hausmann 23 Nov '24

23 Nov '24

Hi all, Next week Moritz Scheer will talk about his master's thesis entitled “Renormalization-Based Preparation of Matrix Product States”. The talk will take place on Monday in HIT K 51 at 14:00. See below for the abstract. Best, Ladina ******* Title: Renormalization-Based Preparation of Matrix Product States Abstract: The preparation of useful quantum states on quantum computers is a crucial subroutine in numerous quantum algorithms. Recently, a novel quantum state preparation protocol has been introduced based on the renormalization-group transformation for matrix product states. With local unitary circuits, this method prepares translation-invariant normal MPS for n sites up to error ϵ in depth O(log n/ϵ), which is asymptotically optimal. During my Master thesis, we implemented the renormalization-based preparation algorithm for a family of normal MPS that correspond to ground states of a one-dimensional spin-1/2 Hamiltonian in both the trivial and symmetry-protected topological phases. We executed this algorithm for the first time on a quantum computer using IBM’s latest QPU ibm_fez, and successfully classified the phase of states with up to 80 qubits. Additionally, we compared the renormalization-based preparation protocol with the sequential preparation algorithm, which prepares MPS in depth O(n). In the trivial phase, we observed a cross-over point at approximately 40 qubits. Beyond that, the renormalization-based protocol outperforms the sequential method, demonstrating its superior asymptotic scaling. In this presentation, I will give an introduction to tensor networks and matrix product states, present the sequential and renormalisation-based preparation protocols, and summarise the results obtained during the project.

1 0

Next week's QIT seminar on Wednesday at 14:00 in HIT K52
by Ladina Hausmann 15 Nov '24

15 Nov '24

Hi all, next Monday the former group member Henrik Wilming will give the theory colloquium (https://theorycolloquium.phys.ethz.ch/) so the seminar will be next Wednesday at 14:00 in HIT K52. Then Anqi Gong will talk about “Computation with Quantum Reed-Muller Codes and their Mapping onto 2D Atom Arrays”, see below for the abstract. Best, Ladina **** Title: Computation with Quantum Reed-Muller Codes and their Mapping onto 2D Atom Arrays Abstract: The Steane [[7,1,3]] and the [[15,1,3]] codes are two small instances of punctured quantum Reed-Muller (PQRM) codes admitting transversal (CNOT, H, S) and (CNOT, T) gates, respectively. We generalize them to higher distance PQRM codes, namely [[127,1,15]] and [[127,1,7]]. To enable a universal fault-tolerant computation protocol with them, we are left to solve the following two questions. (1) How to switch between the two codes fault-tolerantly. (2) How to fault-tolerantly prepare the logical states. We show that (1) can be realized through Steane error correction and give a solution for (2) based on automorphism-permuted verification. Our presented solutions are tailored to the neutral atom platform and give superior numerical performance under extended rectangle analysis

1 0

No QIT seminar next week
by Ladina Hausmann 07 Nov '24

07 Nov '24

Hi all, there is no QIT seminar planned for next week. Best, Ladina

1 0

Next weeks QIT seminar
by Ladina Hausmann 31 Oct '24

31 Oct '24

Hi all, Next Monday Ghislain Fourny will talk about his work on “Quantum theory as a game between observers and nature: a local-realist extension model with a revisited form of free choice”, see below for the abstract. The talk will take place in HIT F 12 at 16:00. Best, Ladina *** Title: Quantum theory as a game between observers and nature: a local-realist extension model with a revisited form of free choice Abstract: In the field of quantum foundations, it is common to abstract away quantum physics experiments in terms of choosing settings and then reading outcomes on measurement devices. Multiple experiments can then be connected together in a generic fashion with frameworks such as process matrices. Then, the frequency distribution of the outcomes conditioned on the settings can be obtained both theoretically (via the generalized Born rule based on the process matrix and on the local instruments corresponding to the chosen settings and the considered outcomes) and practically (e.g., by actually carrying out the experiment with spin measurements). The consequences of assumptions such as measurement independence (aka free choice) and of local realism can then be investigated in terms of the conditional probabilities being constrained to convex polytopes, the faces of which correspond to Bell inequalities. Our contribution is that, in the particular case of fixed causal order, we showed that it is possible to view quantum processes as games between the observers (who pick the settings) and the universe (which picks the outcomes)—in other words, we reformulated quantum theory as a decision theory rather than as a probabilistic theory. The game framework, called “spacetime games," is generic enough to account for space-like separation between the labs, time-like separation between the labs but also including adaptive measurements (i.e., a setting may not be fully exogenous, but may instead depend on causally-preceding outcomes). While spacetime games can be seen as a generalization of nonlocal games to general processes (including the derivation of Bell inequalities and the corresponding polytopes), they differ from nonlocal games in that the universe agents do not try to maximally break Bell inequalities, but instead aim at minimizing their action, which is modeled as rewards in the game. We showed that the Nash-equilibrium approach to game theory checks all the boxes of the assumptions behind Bell inequalities: (i) unilateral deviations of strategies correspond to measurement independence and an exogenous choice of settings, (ii) imperfect information corresponds to locality (finite speed of light) but also more broadly to noncontextuality, and (iii) (Nashian) mixed strategies of the universe to realism and to deterministic hidden variable models. The direct consequence is that Nashian game theory is constrained by Bell inequalities, is formally equivalent to deterministic hidden variable models, and thus inadequate for an extension theory of quantum theory. However, there exist alternate approaches to game theory that we formalized in the past 20 years, and which we call "Non-Nashian game theory.” Non-Nashian game theory differs from Nash-based game theory in that deviations are not unilateral—thus, it does not fulfill one of the assumptions behind Bell inequalities and many other impossibility theorems of quantum foundations—but it preserves local-realism. More specifically, the prediction of a decision (setting or outcome) depends counterfactually on the decision. In particular, we have in our toolbox a solution concept and algorithm called “Perfect Prediction Equilibrium” that is able to pinpoint either 0 or 1 solutions (a fixpoint), but not more, for any spacetime game in general position. This means that the algorithm predicts individual runs, making it a local-realist (but not measurement-independent) extension model. The model’s open parameters (which must be specified to make it a full-fledged extension theory) are the reward formulas (depending on the settings, outcomes, and global hidden variable) in the leaves of the game structure. We are currently using a machine-learning approach based on Physics-Inspired Models (PIN) that aims at discovering the reward formulas that recover the frequencies predicted by the Born rule, i.e., in a way that is consistent with actual Bell-inequality-breaking experiments. In this talk, I will give a general introduction to the spacetime framework and to the non-Nashian resolution algorithm. I will also give a few recent insights regarding the reward formulas in the case of the EPR (2 players/2 settings/2 outcomes) experiment, and show that the non-Nashian algorithm is able, in the EPR case, to produce a frequency distribution that is obtained through the random selection of the value of a hidden variable, and that breaks the CHSH inequality. I will also briefly explain how spacetime games seen from the Nash perspective recover causal contextuality scenarios (Abramsky et al, 2024) and by transitivity several other frameworks (contextuality and nonlocal games in the flat case, the Gogioso-Pinzani framework in the case of fixed causal order, classical causal networks, etc). This considerably simplifies several constructs and proofs by exploiting well-known, decade-old (1950 and later) game theory results. [ High-level explanations and references to published papers on http://www.non-nashian-game-theory.org <http://www.non-nashian-game-theory.org/> <http://www.non-nashian-game-theory.org/> ]

1 0

Next weeks QIT seminar in HIT E 41.1
by Ladina Hausmann 24 Oct '24

24 Oct '24

Hi all, this week Filip Mrcarica will tell us about “Tensor network decoding for stabilizer codes based on the syndrome trellis representation”. The talk will take place on Monday at 16:00 in HIT E 41.1. See below for the abstract. Best, Ladina *** Title: Tensor network decoding for stabilizer codes based on the syndrome trellis representation Abstract: Quantum error correction has become a crucial component for achieving fault-tolerant quantum computing. However, one key challenge that remains is the development of effective decoders. In this work, we introduce a novel approach for constructing an optimal decoder for quantum error-correcting codes, leveraging the concept of syndrome trellises. Our method translates the trellis representation of a stabilizer code into a tensor network decoder, allowing for the incorporation of degeneracy of quantum errors. As a result, this decoder is expected to achieve optimal error correction thresholds.

1 0

No seminar next week
by Ladina Hausmann 18 Oct '24

18 Oct '24

Hi all, there is no seminar scheduled for next week. Best, Ladina

1 0

Next weeks QIT seminars
by Ladina Hausmann 10 Oct '24

10 Oct '24

Hi all, Next week we will have two seminars both will be in HIT E41.1 1. On Monday at 16:00 Antonia Weber will talk about “The Bose-Marletto-Vedral proposal in different frames of reference and the quantum nature of gravity” 2. On Tuesday at 13:00 Elias Rothlin will talk about "Bridging Quantum Error Correction, Gauge Theory Quantisation and Quantum Reference Frames” see below for the abstracts. Best, Ladina %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Title: The Bose-Marletto-Vedral proposal in different frames of reference and the quantum nature of gravity Abstract: Observing spatial entanglement in the Bose-Marletto-Vedral (BMV) experiment would demonstrate the existence of non-classical properties of the gravitational field. We show that the special relativistic invariance of the linear regime of general relativity implies that all the components of the gravitational potential must be non-classical. This is simply necessary in order to describe the BMV entanglement consistently across different inertial frames of reference. On the other hand, we show that the entanglement in accelerated frames could differ from that in stationary frames. ********************** Titel: Bridging Quantum Error Correction, Gauge Theory Quantisation and Quantum Reference Frames Abstract: By encoding logical data in the entanglement structure of a larger set of physical qubits, quantum error correction (QEC) paves the way for fault-tolerant quantum computing. Lately, ideas from QEC have also found applications in other areas of theoretical physics, e.g. as toy models for holography. In this talk, I will connect concepts in the stabilizer formalism of QEC with the Dirac quantization of gauge theories as well as quantum reference frames (QRFs). The latter connection will be made explicit by interpreting the code subspace in a system of physical qubits as a perspective-neutral structure as introduced for QRFs. Lastly, I will provide perspectives on the future developments and potential applications arising from these connections.

1 0

No QIT seminar next week
by Ladina Hausmann 04 Oct '24

04 Oct '24

Hi all, there is no QIT seminar planned for next week. Best, Ladina

1 0

Monday's QIT seminar at 16:00 in E41.1.
by Ladina Hausmann 26 Sep '24

26 Sep '24

Hi all, Next week Antoine Coquet will talk about “Ruling out N-partite quantum causal networks as a complete theory of Nature”, see below for the abstract. The talk will take place on Monday at 16:00 in HIT E41.1. Best, Ladina *** Title: Ruling out N-partite quantum causal networks as a complete theory of Nature Abstract: A fundamental pursuit of physics is to understand correlations between events, or, in other words, causal relationships. Causal networks are a useful conceptual tool to study such causal structures. In this talk, we will: i) Give a brief introduction to the different types of correlations in Nature and to causal networks. ii) Introduce the class of proof techniques called "proofs by inflation" alongside a novel instance of such proofs which was developed in the course of the present work. iii) Use the above to prove that Nature’s correlations cannot be captured by quantum causal networks of N-partite quantum resources even when allowing for unlimited access to shared classical randomness.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

ITP-quantumseminare