Urs, can you please send your input files, especially the lattice file. Could you please also check whether the dirloop_sse_v1 code, which is the old code, works on your input?
Matthias
Begin forwarded message:
From: Sergei Isakov isakov@itp.phys.ethz.ch Date: October 28, 2010 18:59:30 GMT+02:00 To: Matthias Troyer troyer@phys.ethz.ch Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] Problem in ALPS 2.0b4 which does not occur in ALPS 1.3.3
I don't really understand this output. I probably need that lattices-ug.xml file to check. Does dirloop_sse_v1 work?
Best, Sergei
On 28 Oct 2010, at 18:47, Matthias Troyer wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Urs Gerber ITP gerberu@itp.unibe.ch Date: October 28, 2010 15:43:38 GMT+02:00 To: comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch Subject: [ALPS-users] Problem in ALPS 2.0b4 which does not occur in ALPS 1.3.3 Reply-To: comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Here are the files I use and the output I get:
bilayer-test:
LATTICE_LIBRARY="./../lattices-ug.xml"; LATTICE="latticegraph square bilayer"; MODEL_LIBRARY="./../models.xml"; MODEL="spin"; local_S=1/2; L = 12; Jxy0=1; Jz0=3.3; Jxy1=3.45; Jz1=3.45; THERMALIZATION=1000; SWEEPS=1000; beta=48; {h0=7.5;}
bilayer-test.in.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ALPS.xsl"?>
<JOB xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://xml.comp-phys.org/2003/8/job.xsd"> <OUTPUT file="bilayer-test.out.xml"/> <TASK status="new"> <INPUT file="bilayer-test.task1.in.xml"/> <OUTPUT file="bilayer-test.task1.out.xml"/> </TASK> </JOB>
output in the terminal:
Quantum Monte Carlo simulations using the SSE algorithm v. 4.0 available from http://alps.comp-phys.org/ copyright (c) 2003-2010 by Sergei Isakov isakov@itp.phys.ethz.ch
using the ALPS parallelizing scheduler copyright (c) 1994-2006 by Matthias Troyer troyer@comp-phys.org. see Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1505, p. 191 (1998).
based on the ALPS libraries version 2.0.0b4 available from http://alps.comp-phys.org/ copyright (c) 1994-2010 by the ALPS collaboration. Consult the web page for license details. For details see the publication: A.F. Albuquerque et al., J. of Magn. and Magn. Materials 310, 1187 (2007).
parsing task files ... Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5
Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 5.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5
Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 5.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5
Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 5.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5
Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 5.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.001 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0)
SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS.
Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2.
Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6
Final solution 0 at iteration 6.
Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0
Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Created run 1 locally Starting task 1.
After this it stops creating output in the terminal and no output files are produced.