- Comp-phys-alps-users - lists.phys.ethz.ch

"exit status=265" ?
by Chen Ahai 28 Mar '11

28 Mar '11

dear all, The DMRG program is exit and get “exit status=265” when I calculate the correlation function with more than 40 sweeps and 400 maxstates on a cluster with PBS. Enough memory is offered here (more than 20G). I have no idea about this return.....is anyone know about this problem? thank you very much ! chenahai -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chen Ahai Department of Physics, Zhejiang Normal University Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, 321004, China e-mail: chenahaiphysics(a)gmail.com; chenahai(a)yahoo.cn

1 0

multiple eigenvalues (degenerate eigenstates) in sparsediag
by Andriy Zhugayevych 25 Mar '11

25 Mar '11

For a system with multiple eigenvalues (e.g. ground state of the extended Hubbard model on a closed chain of 4 sites with 4 electrons, zero spin, and U=2V) sparsediag program returns only one eigenstate for each multiplet. How other eigenstates can be obtained if there is no quantum number differentiating them? Thanks, Andriy

2 1

Re: [ALPS-users] How to define an operator A in "models.xml"
by 孙照宇 25 Mar '11

25 Mar '11

Dear Matthias, Thank you very much for your reply. I have solved the problem with my own DMRG code. However, I will keep tracking ALPS project. It is indeed very great. Thank you for your work. 2011/3/25 <comp-phys-alps-users-request(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch> > Send Comp-phys-alps-users mailing list submissions to > comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.phys.ethz.ch/listinfo/comp-phys-alps-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > comp-phys-alps-users-request(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch > > You can reach the person managing the list at > comp-phys-alps-users-owner(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Comp-phys-alps-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: How to define an operator A in "models.xml" (Matthias Troyer) > 2. multiple eigenvalues (degenerate eigenstates) in sparsediag > (Andriy Zhugayevych) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 12:28:28 -0500 > From: Matthias Troyer <troyer(a)phys.ethz.ch> > Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] How to define an operator A in "models.xml" > To: comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch > Message-ID: <DAC79DA4-5BC5-49DA-BAAE-1B885B6736BB(a)phys.ethz.ch> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Dear Sunzhaoyu, > > This is not implemented yet. For now you will have to decompose it into > more elementary operators. > > Matthias > > On Mar 18, 2011, at 12:38 AM, ??? wrote: > > > Dear ALPS users and developers > > > > I want to re-produce the result of a 12x2 spin ladder with four-site > interaction. > > The four-site interaction is between two nearest-neighboring rungs. > > Please see: > > [ Phys. Rev. B 74, 155119 (2006), > http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v74/i15/e155119 ] > > > > > > However, it seems that ALPS 2.0 do not support 4-site terms. > > Thus I define every rung as a single site, > > then the ladder becomes a one-dimensional chain (local degree of freedom > is 4), > > and the four-site interaction becomes a two-site interaction. > > > > In original ladder, the SITEBASIS is just {sz} = {-1/2, 1/2}. > > In this basis operators such as Sminus have very compact expressions > > thus they can be simply define as: > > <OPERATOR name="Sminus" matrixelement="sqrt(S*(S+1)-Sz*(Sz-1))"> > > > > > > However, in the new model, a possible choice of SITEBASIS is {J,Jz}={00, > 1-1, 10, 11}. > > In this new basis, operators do not have very compact expressions, > > however, the elements of the operator can be easily obtained through > unitary transformation. > > The problem is, I can figure out all the elements of an operator in > basis{J, Jz}, but I do not know how to define the operator in "models.xml". > > > > In other words, > > suppose an operator X in basis {J, Jz} is explicitly found to be > > [ 1, 0, 0, 0 > > 0, 2, 1, 0 > > 0, 1, 3, 0 > > 0, 0, 0, 4] > > then in ALPS 2.0, is it possible to define X by simply writing down every > elements Xij in "models.xml" ? > > > > Any suggestion would be appreciated. > > > > > > sunzhaoyu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

1 0

How to define an operator A in "models.xml"
by 孙照宇 24 Mar '11

24 Mar '11

Dear ALPS users and developers I want to re-produce the result of a 12x2 spin ladder with four-site interaction. The four-site interaction is between two nearest-neighboring rungs. Please see: [ Phys. Rev. B 74, 155119 (2006), http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v74/i15/e155119 ] However, it seems that ALPS 2.0 do not support 4-site terms. Thus I define every rung as a single site, then the ladder becomes a one-dimensional chain (local degree of freedom is 4), and the four-site interaction becomes a two-site interaction. In original ladder, the SITEBASIS is just {sz} = {-1/2, 1/2}. In this basis operators such as Sminus have very compact expressions thus they can be simply define as: <OPERATOR name="Sminus" matrixelement="sqrt(S*(S+1)-Sz*(Sz-1))"> However, in the new model, a possible choice of SITEBASIS is {J,Jz}={00, 1-1, 10, 11}. In this new basis, operators do not have very compact expressions, however, the elements of the operator can be easily obtained through unitary transformation. The problem is, I can figure out all the elements of an operator in basis{J, Jz}, but I do not know how to define the operator in "models.xml". In other words, suppose an operator X in basis {J, Jz} is explicitly found to be [ 1, 0, 0, 0 0, 2, 1, 0 0, 1, 3, 0 0, 0, 0, 4] then in ALPS 2.0, is it possible to define X by simply writing down every elements Xij in "models.xml" ? Any suggestion would be appreciated. sunzhaoyu

2 1

Bose Hubbard and DMRG
by "Michał Maik" 23 Mar '11

23 Mar '11

Hi I was wondering if DMRG works with the boson Hubbard model? I tried making a parameter file for a 1D open chain lattice with filling factor of one and the DMRG routine wouldn't work. Are there certain parameter restrictions that must be put into place for it to work? Thanks Regards Michal Maik

3 3

Sx in 1D Hubbard Model
by Miguel Dias Costa 21 Mar '11

21 Mar '11

Hello all. As a test case for Alps 2, we are running fulldiag for a 1D Hubbard model with only three lattice sites, res = pyalps.runApplication('fulldiag',input_file,writexml=True) data = pyalps.loadEigenstateMeasurements(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix='parm1')) and are measuring 'MEASURE_CORRELATIONS[Sx Sx]' : "Sx:Sx", 'MEASURE_CORRELATIONS[Sz Sz]' : "Sz:Sz", 'MEASURE_CORRELATIONS[NupNdw]' : "Nup:Ndown", 'MEASURE_CORRELATIONS[NupNup]' : "Nup:Nup", and everything seems to check out fine, except of <Sx Sx>. We see that the site operator Sx is correctly defined from Splus and Sminus, but is this the way to use it in the measurements? Cheers, Miguel

2 3

Compiling Alps 2 on Fedora 14
by Miguel Costa 16 Mar '11

16 Mar '11

Hello all. I followed the instructions in http://alps.comp-phys.org/mediawiki/index.php/Download_and_install_ALPS_2 to compile and install ALPS2 on a Fedora 14 x86_64 machine, and did manage to install it, but there were a few caveats and 3 tests failed in the end, so I thought I'd share my experience and ask for help here. Basically, what I did was get the tar.gz with boost (because f14 still has 1.44), unpacked, created the build dir and then installed missing dependencies (numpy, hdf5, lapack-devel, blas-devel, fftw-devel, sqlite-devel). Some where not documented, like lpsolve and szip (from hdf site), and I had to look in CMakeCache.txt for the variable names, so if I didn't miss it, maybe this could be included in the docs? After trying cmake a lot of times, I had to delete the build directory and create a fresh one, and run cmake -D SZIP_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=~/Downloads/szip-2.1/szip/include -D LPSolve_INCLUDE_DIR:PATH=/usr/include/lpsolve -D Boost_ROOT_DIR:PATH=~/Downloads/alps-2.0.0-r5363-src-with-boost/boost ~/Downloads/alps-2.0.0-r5363-src-with-boost/alps 2>&1 | tee cmake.log make make test and torwards the end I got 90/92 Test #90: python_hlist_test ................***Failed 1.84 sec Start 91: python_mcdata 91/92 Test #91: python_mcdata ....................***Failed 0.19 sec Start 92: python_pyhdf5 92/92 Test #92: python_pyhdf5 ....................***Failed 0.18 sec 97% tests passed, 3 tests failed out of 92 I did "make install", but has anyone else had this problems? Could it be because Fedora 14 comes with python 2.7 ? Thanks in advance, Cheers, Miguel

3 3

Error launching cpp executable
by jessica.alfonsi＠unipd.it 14 Mar '11

14 Mar '11

Dear ALPS users and developers, I know this issue is more appropriate for an IBM AIX forum, but since I found no working solution after contacting other forums, I hope somebody here can give me some useful hint...After successfully compiling the latest ALPS 2.0 nightly sources and my code with CMake build system, as reported on the website, I get the following message when running my code (the compiler is the latest xlC 11.1 on AIX 6.1): -bash-3.2$ ./hubbardfly exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program hubbardfly because of the following errors: rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decimal128ToNumber was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decContextDefault was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberCopy was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberFromString was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberToString was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberPower was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberDivide was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberMultiply was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberToIntegralValue was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberSubtract was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberCompare was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberZero was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberAdd was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decimal64ToNumber was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decimal32ToNumber was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decimal64FromNumber was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decimal128FromNumber was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decimal32FromNumber was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-001 Symbol decNumberQuantize was referenced from module /gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0-r5421-src-with-boost/installO2/lib/libalps.so(), but a runtime definition of the symbol was not found. rtld: 0712-002 fatal error: exiting. Best regards, Jessica

2 1

request(problem in full-diagonalization)
by javad vahedi 13 Mar '11

13 Mar '11

Dear Prof..Matthias Thanks for your immediate response. But I think the program finished see the bellow lines which appear in my terminal *parsing task files ... Starting task 1. Quantumnumber Sz going from -6 to 6 with increment 1 Checking if it is finished: not yet, next check in 60 seconds ( 0% done). Halted Simulation 1 This task took 574 seconds. Checkpointing Simulation 1 Finished with everything. fulldiag_evaluate --DELTA_T 0.1 --T_MIN 0.1 --T_MAX 10.0 ./parm_javad.task1.out.xml 134 sectors* after these lines, 6 windows open in my screen with axes labels and their legend but without any curve. -- Best Regards Javad Vahedi,

1 0

request(problem in full-diagonalization)
by javad vahedi 13 Mar '11

13 Mar '11

Dear Prof..Matthias Thanks for your immediate response. But I think the program finished see the bellow lines which appear in my terminal parsing task files ... Starting task 1. Quantumnumber Sz going from -6 to 6 with increment 1 Checking if it is finished: not yet, next check in 60 seconds ( 0% done). Halted Simulation 1 This task took 574 seconds. Checkpointing Simulation 1 Finished with everything. fulldiag_evaluate --DELTA_T 0.1 --T_MIN 0.1 --T_MAX 10.0 ./parm_javad.task1.out.xml 134 sectors after these lines, 6 windows open in my screen with axes labels and their legend but without any curve. -- Best Regards Javad Vahedi, Dept. of Physics, Sari Branch of Islamic Azad University, P.O.Box 48164-194, Sari, Iran. Tel: (+98) 911 1554504 Fax: (+98)151 2256679 E-mail: javahedi(a)gmail.com javahedi(a)iausari.aci.ir

1 0