Dear All, I have successfully compiled the alps. However i have an issue with failed tests. Almost half of them fails:

The following tests FAILED: 70 - expression2 (Failed) 69 - expression (Failed) 60 - model_example18 (Failed) 59 - model_example17 (Failed) 58 - model_example16 (Failed) 57 - model_example15 (Failed) 56 - model_example14 (Failed) 55 - model_example13 (Failed) 54 - model_example12 (Failed) 53 - model_example11 (Failed) 52 - model_example10 (Failed) 89 - temperature_scan (Failed) 51 - model_example9 (Failed) 85 - integer_range (Failed) 81 - exmc_optimize (Failed) 25 - test_vector (Failed) 26 - lattice_example1 (Failed) 9 - ising_fortran (Failed) 8 - hello_fortran (Failed) 4 - wanglandau (Failed) 3 - exchange (Failed) 2 - loop_single (Failed) 38 - coloring (Failed) 50 - model_example8 (Failed) 49 - model_example7 (Failed) 48 - model_example6 (Failed) 47 - model_example5 (Failed) 46 - model_example4 (Failed) 45 - model_example3 (Failed) 44 - model_example2 (Failed) 43 - model_example1 (Failed) 39 - parity (Failed) 1 - ising_single (Failed) 37 - lattice_label (Failed) 36 - lattice_example11 (Failed) 35 - lattice_example10 (Failed) 34 - lattice_example9 (Failed) 33 - lattice_example8 (Failed) 32 - lattice_example7 (Failed) 31 - lattice_example6 (Failed) 30 - lattice_example5 (Failed) 29 - lattice_example4 (Failed) 28 - lattice_example3 (Failed) 27 - lattice_example2 (Failed) Errors while running CTest

For example:

-bash-4.2$ ./model_example2 Caught exception: Illegal term in expression -bash-4.2$ ./model_example3 Caught exception: Illegal term in expression -bash-4.2$ ./model_example4 Caught exception: Illegal term in expression -bash-4.2$ ./model_example5 Caught exception: Illegal term in expression -bash-4.2$ ./model_example6 Illegal term in expression -bash-4.2$ ./model_example7 Illegal term in expression -bash-4.2$ ./lattice_example1 Caught exception: Did not parse to end of string 'DEPLETION' -bash-4.2$ ./lattice_example2 Caught exception: Did not parse to end of string 'DEPLETION' -bash-4.2$ ./lattice_example3 Caught exception: Did not parse to end of string 'DEPLETION'

some of these tests run for a long time or there is a problem with some infinite loop (lattice_example4, lattice_example5, model_example8, model_example10. Is there some debug mode which could tell what exactly is the cause ?

Regards, Mateusz

Yes, that's normal and can be ignored. These are warnings from libraries that are used and not serious.

On Nov 20, 2011, at 1:32 AM, Mateusz Łącki wrote:

Dear M. Troyer, Thank you very much- it appears that it helped - the compilation moved forward by at least 5%. Meanwhile I would like to ask whether this:

In file included from /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig.h:6:0, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/python/detail/wrap_python.hpp:50, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/python/detail/prefix.hpp:13, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/python/args.hpp:8, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/python.hpp:11, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp:71, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/alea.h:34, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/scheduler/montecarlo.C:30: /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig-64.h:1164:0: warning: "_POSIX_C_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by default] /usr/include/features.h:164:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/include/python2.7/pyconfig-64.h:1186:0: warning: "_XOPEN_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by default] /usr/include/features.h:166:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition

and this :

In file included from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/random.hpp:40:0, from /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/random/rngfactory.C:32: /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/random/lagged_fibonacci.hpp: In static member function ‘static boost::random::lagged_fibonacci_engine<UIntType, w, p, q>::result_type boost::random::lagged_fibonacci_engine<UIntType, w, p, q>::max() [with UIntType = unsigned int, int w = 48, unsigned int p = 607u, unsigned int q = 273u, boost::random::lagged_fibonacci_engine<UIntType, w, p, q>::result_type = unsigned int]’: /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/random/buffered_rng.h:151:113: instantiated from ‘alps::buffered_rng_base::result_type alps::buffered_rng<RNG>::max() const [with RNG = boost::random::lagged_fibonacci<unsigned int, 48, 607u, 273u>, alps::buffered_rng_base::result_type = unsigned int]’ /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/random/rngfactory.C:42:35: instantiated from here /home/stefan/alps/alps-2.0.2-r5790-src-with-boost/boost/boost/random/lagged_fibonacci.hpp:60:34: warning: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]

is normal, or should I be concerned? Particularly this "integer truncated" sounds dangerous - could this result in errors in results (not runtime, but correctness)? The line 60 of the file mentioned does not seem to contain any formula....

Regards, Mateusz Lacki