Dear Prof. Troyer,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Troyer troyer@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Regarding lp_solve, we are testing an ALPS replacement for it, so that user do not need to download it in the future.
Is implementing own Linear Programming solver easier than updating to lp_solve 5.5? Since Debian/Ubuntu/RHEL all have official lp_solve package (5.5), updating should be enough from the packaging purpose. (See #68 on trac).
Best regards,
Yes, since this is always causing problems for the users. While some Linux distributions have nice packages not all do.
On 30.11.2010, at 07:18, Ryo IGARASHI rigarash@hosi.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp wrote:
Dear Prof. Troyer,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Troyer troyer@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Regarding lp_solve, we are testing an ALPS replacement for it, so that user do not need to download it in the future.
Is implementing own Linear Programming solver easier than updating to lp_solve 5.5? Since Debian/Ubuntu/RHEL all have official lp_solve package (5.5), updating should be enough from the packaging purpose. (See #68 on trac).
Best regards,
Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D. rigarash@hosi.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OpenPGP fingerprint: BAD9 71E3 28F3 8952 5640 6A53 EC79 A280 6A19 2319
comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch