Re: [ALPS-users] ALPS 2.0 release candidate

Hi Matthias,

I send you attached the output generated by make -k command.

I used LAPACK_64_BIT ON when configuring. I used the default lapack and blas libraries from Kubuntu 10.10 distribution. I agree that the problem may be due to LAPACK and BLAS libraries.

Currently I unset LAPACK_64_BIT variable and running a new make.

I will let you know the result when it finish.

Thanks, Ruben

________________________________ From: Matthias Troyer troyer@phys.ethz.ch To: General discussion on the ALPS library components and their development comp-phys-alps-devel@lists.phys.ethz.ch Cc: comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch; comp-phys-alps-devel comp-phys-alps-devel@lists.comp-phys.org Sent: Mon, November 22, 2010 3:20:50 PM Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] ALPS 2.0 release candidate

Hi Ruben,

Did you by chance set the variable LAPACK_64_BIT when configuring? If you did so, are you 100% sure that you have a 64 bit LAPACK and BLAS, which uses 8-byte instead of 4-byte integers?

Matthias

On 22 Nov 2010, at 10:12, Ruben Ghulghazaryan wrote:

Hi,

I tried to build new ALPS 2.0 release build (alps-2.0.0rc1-r5175-src-with-boost.tar.gz) with Kubuntu 10.10 and got problem with compilation of qmc code.

Please see the make report of the problem in the attached file.

Regards, Ruben

----- Original Message ---- From: Matthias Troyer troyer@phys.ethz.ch To: comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch; comp-phys-alps-devel comp-phys-alps-devel@lists.comp-phys.org Sent: Sat, November 20, 2010 10:04:05 PM Subject: [ALPS-users] ALPS 2.0 release candidate

Dear all,

we finally have an ALPS 2 release candidate available on the Web. The MacOS X 10.5 build will take a bit longer but will also come soon. Please try to use is, install it, check your codes with it and report any bug to the mailing list. We are nearing completion of ALPS 2.0

Matthias Troyer

<alpsreleaseproblem.txt>