Hi Emanuel,
thanks for the explanation! What is your opinion about this? Is it safe to use or does it actually might "hide" problems with non-ergodicity? For example at higher interaction parameters for small Solver-times the up and down components are different, and such move might maybe lead to the wrong conclusion that the solver time is sufficient. Can one safely determine when this is the case?
bests, Steffen
hi Steffen,
there are two relevant parameters:
SPINFLIP which does it only for one segment, and GLOBALFLIP which does it for all of them
Does this correspond to a global move that flips all spins, i.e. for enforcing a paramagnetic solution or does it correspond to the part of the rotationally invariant Hund's coupling which is called Spin-Flip term?
We do not have rotationally invariant Hunds coupling in this, so it’s the first: it takes segments from one orbital and moves the to another one.
Best, Emanuel