Comp-phys-alps-users

comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch

1 participants
1248 discussions

asking for help
by Xiao Quan Yu 08 Nov '10

08 Nov '10

Dear all, We were trying to test ALPS project using 1D Hard-core Bose-Hubbard model, my commands are following: LATTICE="chain lattice"; L=100; MODEL_LIBRARY="/u/cm/carrasqu/ALPS/lib/xml/models.xml"; MODEL="hardcore boson"; t=1; mu=0 T = 0.01; SWEEPS=100000; THERMALIZATION=5000; EPSILON=0.25 {T=0.05} {T=0.04} {T=0.03} {T=0.02} {T=0.01} {T=0.005} {T=0.003} {T=0.002} {T=0.001} At the end, we got the correct ground state energy and charge density, but the stiffness which is 0.00638 at T=0.001 is much smaller than the theoretical estimated value 0.315 at T=0. Is it because the number of sites is too small for this problem ? Or something else? Thank you in advance. Best wishes, Xiaoquan ---------------------------------------------------------------- SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/ Powered by SquirrelMail http://www.squirrelmail.org/

2 1

ALPS light
by Synge Todo 08 Nov '10

08 Nov '10

Dear ALPS users, Thank you very much for your support of the ALPS project. In ALPS version 1, we have offered the ALPS light version, which is the scaled-down version of ALPS published under the Boost license. If you are currently using the ALPS light, and still demand it also in the forthcoming ALPS version 2, please let us know freely as soon as possible. Best regards, Synge Todo

2 1

ALPS 2 compilation on AIX
by jessica.alfonsi＠unipd.it 04 Nov '10

04 Nov '10

Hi Matthias, the workaround for operatordescriptor.h was OK, compilation of examples/test/application has made further progress, however today there are two new errors. 1) The first is related to tests: "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0218 (S) The call does not match any parameter list for "bind<double>". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 49.1: 1540-1283 (I) "boost::lambda::bind<double>(double (&)())" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0295 (I) A parameter of type "double (&)()" cannot be initialized with an rvalue of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 71.1: 1540-1283 (I) "boost::lambda::bind<double>(const double &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0295 (I) A parameter of type "const double &" cannot be initialized with an rvalue of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 91.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 190.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Arg2> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1), const Arg2 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 212.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 232.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 333.1: 1540-1283 (I) "boost::lambda::bind<double,double,double,boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> >,double>(double (&)(double, double), const lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> > &, const double &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0295 (I) A parameter of type "double (&)(double, double)" cannot be initialized with an rvalue of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 361.1: 1540-1283 (I) "boost::lambda::bind<double,boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> >,double>(const double &, const lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> > &, const double &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0295 (I) A parameter of type "const double &" cannot be initialized with an rvalue of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 387.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 387.1: 1540-1108 (I) "const lambda_functor<lambda_functor_base<boost::lambda::action<3,boost::lambda::function_action<3,double> >,bind_tuple_mapper<const Arg1,const Arg2,const Arg3,boost::tuples::null_type,boost::tuples::null_type,boost::tuples::null_type,boost::tuples::null_type,boost::tuples::null_type,boost::tuples::null_type,boost::tuples::null_type>::type> > (extern "C" double (&)(double, double) const, const lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> > &, const double &)" is not a valid type. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "bind". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 503.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 532.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 558.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 679.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Par4, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 710.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 738.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 867.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Par4, class Par5, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 899.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 927.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1058.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Par4, class Par5, class Par6, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1092.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1123.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1257.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Par4, class Par5, class Par6, class Par7, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6, Par7), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6, Par7)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1291.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1322.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1458.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Par4, class Par5, class Par6, class Par7, class Par8, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6, Par7, Par8), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6, Par7, Par8)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1494.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1526.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1673.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Par1, class Par2, class Par3, class Par4, class Par5, class Par6, class Par7, class Par8, class Par9, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9, class Arg10> boost::lambda::bind(Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6, Par7, Par8, Par9), const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &, const Arg10 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 762.19: 1540-0288 (I) The function template parameter of type "Result (&)(Par1, Par2, Par3, Par4, Par5, Par6, Par7, Par8, Par9)" cannot be initialized with an argument of type "double (*)(double, double)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1710.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9, class Arg10> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &, const Arg10 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9, class Arg10> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &, const Arg10 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/lambda/detail/bind_functions.hpp", line 1743.1: 1540-1283 (I) "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9, class Arg10> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &, const Arg10 &)" is not a viable candidate. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 760.31: 1540-0215 (I) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "template <class Result, class Arg1, class Arg2, class Arg3, class Arg4, class Arg5, class Arg6, class Arg7, class Arg8, class Arg9, class Arg10> boost::lambda::bind(const Arg1 &, const Arg2 &, const Arg3 &, const Arg4 &, const Arg5 &, const Arg6 &, const Arg7 &, const Arg8 &, const Arg9 &, const Arg10 &)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/alea/mcdata.hpp", line 749.41: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "alps::alea::pow<double>(mcdata<double>, element_type)". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/test/alea/mcdata.C", line 37.5: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "main()". make[2]: *** [test/alea/CMakeFiles/mcdata.dir/mcdata.C.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [test/alea/CMakeFiles/mcdata.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 2) The second error (related to applications) is: "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b4-r4959-src-with-boost/alps/applications/qmc/looper/looper/model_parameter.h", line 49.10: 1540-0063 (S) The text "100" is unexpected. "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/boost/boost/mpl/map/aux_/item.hpp", line 117.6: 1540-0095 (W) The friend function declaration "operator||" will cause an error when the enclosing template class is instantiated with arguments that declare a friend function that does not match an existing definition. The function declares only one function because it is not a template but the function type depends on one or more template parameters. make[2]: *** [applications/qmc/looper/CMakeFiles/loop.dir/loop_model.C.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [applications/qmc/looper/CMakeFiles/loop.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 Thanks in advance for your help Best Jessica -- Dr.ssa Jessica Alfonsi Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche Universit� di Padova via Marzolo 1 35100 Padova (Italy) +39 0498275726 e-mail jessica.alfonsi(a)unipd.it

3 5

OpenMP flags issue in ALPS 2
by jessica.alfonsi＠unipd.it 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Hi again Matthias, this mail is about a different issue, maybe with the Cmake Build system, which I have found both with GCC, Intel and Visual Age compilers when compiling ALPS 2 (any beta) with OpenMP support turned on. I should expect in the include.mk file to find the related compiler flag for multithreading (-fopenmp with GCC, etc) as it happened with ALPS 1.3.5, but it doesn't appear anywhere and I have to add it by hand when I have to compile my codes using OpenMP. Since ALPS 1.3.5 worked right, I think that should be fixed in ALPS 2. Best regards, Jessica

2 4

ALPS Bug?
by Emanuele Dalla Torre 03 Nov '10

03 Nov '10

Dear ALPS, thank you for existing! I found something that looks like a bug. I use the worm algorithm (Windows XP) with the following parameter file. When I run the code, it exits without giving any detail. If I change the letter W with any other letter it works. LATTICE="square lattice"; L=4; MODEL_LIBRARY="pairedBEC.model.xml" MODEL="boson Hubbard"; NONLOCAL=0; V = 1.0; W = 0.1; mu = 0.5; Nmax = 2; T = 0.1; SWEEPS=500000; THERMALIZATION=10000; { t=0.01; }

3 2

Fwd: Problem in ALPS 2.0b4 which does not occur in ALPS 1.3.3
by Matthias Troyer 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Urs, can you please send your input files, especially the lattice file. Could you please also check whether the dirloop_sse_v1 code, which is the old code, works on your input? Matthias Begin forwarded message: > From: Sergei Isakov <isakov(a)itp.phys.ethz.ch> > Date: October 28, 2010 18:59:30 GMT+02:00 > To: Matthias Troyer <troyer(a)phys.ethz.ch> > Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] Problem in ALPS 2.0b4 which does not occur in ALPS 1.3.3 > > I don't really understand this output. I probably need that lattices-ug.xml file to check. Does dirloop_sse_v1 work? > > Best, > Sergei > > > On 28 Oct 2010, at 18:47, Matthias Troyer wrote: > >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Urs Gerber ITP <gerberu(a)itp.unibe.ch> >>> Date: October 28, 2010 15:43:38 GMT+02:00 >>> To: comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch >>> Subject: [ALPS-users] Problem in ALPS 2.0b4 which does not occur in ALPS 1.3.3 >>> Reply-To: comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch >>> >>> Here are the files I use and the output I get: >>> >>> bilayer-test: >>> >>> LATTICE_LIBRARY="./../lattices-ug.xml"; >>> LATTICE="latticegraph square bilayer"; >>> MODEL_LIBRARY="./../models.xml"; >>> MODEL="spin"; >>> local_S=1/2; >>> L = 12; >>> Jxy0=1; >>> Jz0=3.3; >>> Jxy1=3.45; >>> Jz1=3.45; >>> THERMALIZATION=1000; >>> SWEEPS=1000; >>> beta=48; >>> {h0=7.5;} >>> >>> >>> bilayer-test.in.xml: >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> >>> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ALPS.xsl"?> >>> <JOB xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://xml.comp-phys.org/2003/8/job.xsd"> >>> <OUTPUT file="bilayer-test.out.xml"/> >>> <TASK status="new"> >>> <INPUT file="bilayer-test.task1.in.xml"/> >>> <OUTPUT file="bilayer-test.task1.out.xml"/> >>> </TASK> >>> </JOB> >>> >>> output in the terminal: >>> >>> Quantum Monte Carlo simulations using the SSE algorithm v. 4.0 >>> available from http://alps.comp-phys.org/ >>> copyright (c) 2003-2010 by Sergei Isakov <isakov(a)itp.phys.ethz.ch> >>> >>> using the ALPS parallelizing scheduler >>> copyright (c) 1994-2006 by Matthias Troyer <troyer(a)comp-phys.org>. >>> see Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1505, p. 191 (1998). >>> >>> based on the ALPS libraries version 2.0.0b4 >>> available from http://alps.comp-phys.org/ >>> copyright (c) 1994-2010 by the ALPS collaboration. >>> Consult the web page for license details. >>> For details see the publication: >>> A.F. Albuquerque et al., J. of Magn. and Magn. Materials 310, 1187 (2007). >>> >>> parsing task files ... >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 >>> >>> Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 5. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 >>> >>> Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 5. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 >>> >>> Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 5. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 >>> >>> Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 5. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.001 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Model name: '' - run #1 >>> Objective: Minimize(R0) >>> >>> SUBMITTED >>> Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. >>> Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. >>> Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. >>> >>> Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. >>> >>> Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 >>> >>> Final solution 0 at iteration 6. >>> >>> Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 >>> >>> Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. >>> In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. >>> There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. >>> ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. >>> Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. >>> Created run 1 locally >>> Starting task 1. >>> >>> >>> After this it stops creating output in the terminal and no output files are produced. >>> >

4 7

ALPS binary packages for Debian (amd64)
by Ryo IGARASHI 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hi, I have created binary packages of ALPS 2.0.0b4 for Debian GNU/Linux (primary for sid(unstable), but should work also on squeeze(testing)). The apt line is as follows (I also updated ALPS wiki): deb http://alps.comp-phys.org/static/software/debian/sid ./ deb-src http://alps.comp-phys.org/static/software/debian/sid ./ Currently, I have only compiled amd64 packages. I can run python-based tutorials with these binary packages[1], but if you find any bugs related to debian packaging, please open the trac ticket and assign to me(rigarash) or just report to the ML. This packaging scheme can be applied of course to the Ubuntu system, I will try to build Ubuntu package (10.10) soon. [1] Since all binaries/scripts are installed system-wide, use 'python' instead of 'alpspython'. -- Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D. rigarash(a)hosi.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OpenPGP fingerprint: BAD9 71E3 28F3 8952 5640 6A53 EC79 A280 6A19 2319

2 2

ALPS 2 compilation on AIX
by jessica.alfonsi＠unipd.it 02 Nov '10

02 Nov '10

Hello Matthias, your workaround for simpleobseval.h worked fine and compilation of examples/tests/applications has made further progress. Now I've found the following error message: "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/model/operatordescriptor.h", line 99.40: 1540-0215 (S) The wrong number of arguments have been specified for "alps::SiteBasisDescriptor<short>::get_parameters(bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/model/operatordescriptor.h", line 95.1: 1540-0700 This occurs both in examples (printnumeric) and in applications (qmc), as reported below: (I) The previous message was produced while processing "alps::OperatorDescriptor<short>::apply<alps::site_state<short>,std::complex<double> >(site_state<short>, const SiteBasisDescriptor<short> &, const ParameterEvaluator<std::complex<double> > &, bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/model/sitebasisdescriptor.h", line 114.20: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "alps::SiteBasisDescriptor<short>::apply<alps::site_state<short>,std::complex<double> >(const string &, site_state<short>, const ParameterEvaluator<std::complex<double> > &, bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/model/siteterm.h", line 142.44: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "alps::SiteOperatorEvaluator<short,std::complex<double>,alps::site_state<short> >::partial_evaluate_function(const string &, const Expression<std::complex<double> > &, bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b3_20101021/alps/src/alps/model/siteterm.h", line 62.7: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "class alps::SiteOperatorEvaluator<short,std::complex<double>,alps::site_state<short> >". make[2]: *** [example/model/CMakeFiles/print_numeric.dir/print_numeric.cpp.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [example/model/CMakeFiles/print_numeric.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 The previous message was produced while processing "alps::OperatorDescriptor<short>::apply<alps::site_state<short>,std::complex<double> >(site_state<short>, const SiteBasisDescriptor<short> &, const ParameterEvaluator<std::complex<double> > &, bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b4-r4959-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/model/sitebasisdescriptor.h", line 114.20: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "alps::SiteBasisDescriptor<short>::apply<alps::site_state<short>,std::complex<double> >(const string &, site_state<short>, const ParameterEvaluator<std::complex<double> > &, bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b4-r4959-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/model/siteterm.h", line 142.44: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "alps::SiteOperatorEvaluator<short,std::complex<double>,alps::site_state<short> >::partial_evaluate_function(const string &, const Expression<std::complex<double> > &, bool) const". "/gpfs/scratch/userexternal/jalfonsi/alps-2.0.0b4-r4959-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/model/siteterm.h", line 62.7: 1540-0700 (I) The previous message was produced while processing "class alps::SiteOperatorEvaluator<short,std::complex<double>,alps::site_state<short> >". make[2]: *** [applications/qmc/checksign/CMakeFiles/checksign.dir/checksign.C.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [applications/qmc/checksign/CMakeFiles/checksign.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 It also occurs in my code, so I hope you can find a fix also for this, please. Thank you in advance for your help. Best Jessica

2 1

FQHE: using non-Hermitian operators as constrains for ED
by Zohar Ringel 28 Oct '10

28 Oct '10

Dear ALPS developers, Some background on the problem I have: --------------------------------------------------- I wish to use the exact diag. application for the FQHE effect on a thin-torus. This can be mapped to a 1D problem on a ring which has both total momenta (P) and total center-of-mass conservation (X). In a ring the position (j), is actually ill defined, therefore I need to define X as a non-Hermitian operator $X = \sum_j e^{i 2\pi j/L} \psi^{\dagger}_x \psi_x$ instead. My questions are: ---------------------- 1. Could a non-Hermitian operator such as X, be given as a conserved quantum number to the exact/sparse diagonalization applications ? 2. For a ring geometry and when within an tag: may I use the site's name ("j") as though it is a variable which holds an integer denoting the position (I need this for the last definition of X). Thanks in advance, Zohar.

2 1

Problem in ALPS 2.0b4 which does not occur in ALPS 1.3.3
by Urs Gerber ITP 28 Oct '10

28 Oct '10

Here are the files I use and the output I get: bilayer-test: LATTICE_LIBRARY="./../lattices-ug.xml"; LATTICE="latticegraph square bilayer"; MODEL_LIBRARY="./../models.xml"; MODEL="spin"; local_S=1/2; L = 12; Jxy0=1; Jz0=3.3; Jxy1=3.45; Jz1=3.45; THERMALIZATION=1000; SWEEPS=1000; beta=48; {h0=7.5;} bilayer-test.in.xml: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="ALPS.xsl"?> <JOB xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="http://xml.comp-phys.org/2003/8/job.xsd"> <OUTPUT file="bilayer-test.out.xml"/> <TASK status="new"> <INPUT file="bilayer-test.task1.in.xml"/> <OUTPUT file="bilayer-test.task1.out.xml"/> </TASK> </JOB> output in the terminal: Quantum Monte Carlo simulations using the SSE algorithm v. 4.0 available from http://alps.comp-phys.org/ copyright (c) 2003-2010 by Sergei Isakov <isakov(a)itp.phys.ethz.ch> using the ALPS parallelizing scheduler copyright (c) 1994-2006 by Matthias Troyer <troyer(a)comp-phys.org>. see Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 1505, p. 191 (1998). based on the ALPS libraries version 2.0.0b4 available from http://alps.comp-phys.org/ copyright (c) 1994-2010 by the ALPS collaboration. Consult the web page for license details. For details see the publication: A.F. Albuquerque et al., J. of Magn. and Magn. Materials 310, 1187 (2007). parsing task files ... Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 5. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 Final solution 0.84127 at iteration 5. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 5. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 42 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 5 Final solution 0.465116 at iteration 5. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 5, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 5.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.001 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Model name: '' - run #1 Objective: Minimize(R0) SUBMITTED Model size: 18 constraints, 9 variables, 48 non-zeros. Constraints: 18 equality, 0 GUB, 0 SOS. Variables: 0 integer, 0 semi-cont., 0 SOS. Using DUAL simplex for phase 1 and PRIMAL simplex for phase 2. Optimal solution with dual simplex at iteration 6 Final solution 0 at iteration 6. Excellent numeric accuracy ||*|| = 0 Memo: Largest [etaPFI v1.0] inv(B) had 0 NZ entries, 0.0x largest basis. In the total iteration count 6, 0 (0.0%) were minor/bound swaps. There were 0 refactorizations, 0 triggered by time and 0 by density. ... on average 6.0 major pivots per refactorization. Total solver time was 0.000 seconds. Created run 1 locally Starting task 1. After this it stops creating output in the terminal and no output files are produced.

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

Comp-phys-alps-users