Hi,
The function generate_spline_matrix in fouriertransform.C in the dmft
folder shows the comments as follows:
// A is the matrix whose inverse defines spline_matrix
//
// 6 6
// 1 4 1
// 1 4 1
// A = ...
//
// 1 4 1
// -2 0 0 2
However, the following codes,
dense_matrix A =
4*dt/6.*boost::numeric::ublas::identity_matrix<double>(Np1);
for (int i=1; i<Np1-1; i++) {
A(i,i-…
[View More]1) = dt/6.;
A(i,i+1) = dt/6.;
}
A(0,0) = 1.;
A(0, Np1-1) = 1.;
A(Np1-1, 0) = -2.*dt/6.;
A(Np1-1, 1) = -1.*dt/6.;
A(Np1-1, Np1-2) = 1*dt/6.;
A(Np1-1, Np1-1) = 2*dt/6.;
the red lines will make the matrix looks like
// 6 6
// 1 4 1
// 1 4 1
// A = ...
//
// 1 4 1
// -2 *-1* *1* 2
Is the comment correct or the code correct? Any reference for this
algorithm?
Thank you,
Kuang-Shing Chen
[View Less]
Dear all,
I am trying to use the Quantum-Wang-Landau (QWL) algorithm to calculate
the entropy of a linear chain spin-1/2 model with Jxy=0 in a field h=1,
which is classical but QWL seems to be suggested for entropy calculations.
However with forty sites and down to low temperatures, I don't seem to be
getting near the correct entropy density result of S ~ 0.4812 ...
The parameter file is
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<&…
[View More]lt;
LATTICE="chain lattice"
MODEL="spin"
local_S=1/2
h=1
J = 1
Jxy = 0
CUTOFF = 500
{L=40}
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
and a partial output of entropy density versus temperature is
<SNIP>
</PARAMETERS>
<legend show="true"/>
<xaxis label="Temperature"/>
<yaxis label="Entropy Density"/>
<set label="">
<point><x>0.10000000000000001</x><y>0.065628773413218822</y></point>
<point><x>0.20000000000000001</x><y>0.13394955300729872</y></point>
<point><x>0.30000000000000004</x><y>0.24229259030929573</y></point>
<point><x>0.40000000000000002</x><y>0.31481859757794478</y></point>
<point><x>0.5</x><y>0.39826073000393336</y></point>
<point><x>0.59999999999999998</x><y>0.46128739087861204</y></point>
<point><x>0.69999999999999996</x><y>0.50938492873462538</y></point>
<point><x>0.79999999999999993</x><y>0.5481023575910553</y></point>
<point><x>0.89999999999999991</x><y>0.57776445729654646</y></point>
<point><x>0.99999999999999989</x><y>0.59988758184662683</y></point>
<point><x>1.0999999999999999</x><y>0.61635447545226674</y></point>
<SNIP>
I have tried changing the lattice length and cut-off but not much
changes.
Any advice on what I might be doing wrong will be greatly appreciated.
With regards,
Vipin
[View Less]
Hi Joseph,
When you conserve Sz, you should include both
'CONSERVED_QUANTUMNUMBERS' : 'Sz'
and the actual value of the magnetization desired, e.g.
'Sz' : 0.0
in the parms data. If you do not put any value for Sz then tebd will work
in the sector with all spins up, as you described.
-Michael
Hello all again,
>
> I have been having a problem with my results for quenching a spin-1/2 XXZ
> model in the TEBD code and both my colleagues and I are stumped. I am
> attempting to …
[View More]study a quench from Delta = 4 to 2 in the XXZ model, starting
> from the ground state of the original Hamiltonian, and looking at the local
> magnetisation and correlation functions that result. I tried this out in
> small systems (around L=32), following the tutorials very closely and
> adapting them to my situation, and looking at the local magnetisation. When
> I included S_z (the total S_z) as a conserved quantum number in my
> parameters, I got no time dependence in my results, with each S_z being 1/2
> everywhere along the chain for every time, which seems to be nonsensical.
> However, when I removed this constraint, I got (after a much longer
> simulation) more sensible results, with a time-dependence and the results
> being closer to 0. I am fairly certain that S_z should be conserved here,
> so my question is why does this not seem to work? I followed the tutorials
> very closely, and those scripts seem to work well enough. The parameter
> section of my script is as follows:
>
> import pyalps
> import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
> import pyalps.plot
> import numpy as np
> import copy
>
> parms = [ {
> 'L' : 32,
> 'MODEL' : 'spin',
> 'local_S' : 0.5,
> 'Jxy' : 1,
> 'Jz' : 4.0,
> 'ITP_CHIS' : [40, 40, 40],
> 'ITP_DTS' : [0.05, 0.05, 0.025],
> 'ITP_CONVS' : [1E-9, 1E-9, 1E-10],
> 'INITIAL_STATE' : 'ground',
> 'CHI_LIMIT' : 40,
> 'TRUNC_LIMIT' : 1E-12,
> 'NUM_THREADS' : 1,
> 'TAUS' : [0.0, 50.0],
> 'POWS' : [0.0, 1.0],
> 'GS' : ['Jz', 'Jz'],
> 'GIS' : [4.0, 2.0],
> 'GFS' : [2.0, 2.0],
> 'NUMSTEPS' : [100, 2500],
> 'STEPSFORSTORE' : [5, 5]
> } ]
>
> baseName = 'Jz4to2Quench1L32'
> nmlname = pyalps.writeTEBDfiles(parms, baseName)
> res = pyalps.runTEBD(nmlname)
>
> Data = pyalps.load.loadTimeEvolution(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix =
> 'Jz4to2Quench1L32'), measurements = ['Local Magnetization'])
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated, as my simulations would be much
> faster if I could include this!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joseph Prentice
>
>
[View Less]
Hello all again,
I have been having a problem with my results for quenching a spin-1/2 XXZ model in the TEBD code and both my colleagues and I are stumped. I am attempting to study a quench from Delta = 4 to 2 in the XXZ model, starting from the ground state of the original Hamiltonian, and looking at the local magnetisation and correlation functions that result. I tried this out in small systems (around L=32), following the tutorials very closely and adapting them to my situation, and looking …
[View More]at the local magnetisation. When I included S_z (the total S_z) as a conserved quantum number in my parameters, I got no time dependence in my results, with each S_z being 1/2 everywhere along the chain for every time, which seems to be nonsensical. However, when I removed this constraint, I got (after a much longer simulation) more sensible results, with a time-dependence and the results being closer to 0. I am fairly certain that S_z should be conserved here, so my question is why does this not seem to work? I followed the tutorials very closely, and those scripts seem to work well enough. The parameter section of my script is as follows:
import pyalps
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import pyalps.plot
import numpy as np
import copy
parms = [ {
'L' : 32,
'MODEL' : 'spin',
'local_S' : 0.5,
'Jxy' : 1,
'Jz' : 4.0,
'ITP_CHIS' : [40, 40, 40],
'ITP_DTS' : [0.05, 0.05, 0.025],
'ITP_CONVS' : [1E-9, 1E-9, 1E-10],
'INITIAL_STATE' : 'ground',
'CHI_LIMIT' : 40,
'TRUNC_LIMIT' : 1E-12,
'NUM_THREADS' : 1,
'TAUS' : [0.0, 50.0],
'POWS' : [0.0, 1.0],
'GS' : ['Jz', 'Jz'],
'GIS' : [4.0, 2.0],
'GFS' : [2.0, 2.0],
'NUMSTEPS' : [100, 2500],
'STEPSFORSTORE' : [5, 5]
} ]
baseName = 'Jz4to2Quench1L32'
nmlname = pyalps.writeTEBDfiles(parms, baseName)
res = pyalps.runTEBD(nmlname)
Data = pyalps.load.loadTimeEvolution(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix = 'Jz4to2Quench1L32'), measurements = ['Local Magnetization'])
Any help would be greatly appreciated, as my simulations would be much faster if I could include this!
Thanks,
Joseph Prentice
[View Less]
Hi Michael,
Brilliant, that's just what I needed! Thank you very much.
Joseph
On 30 Jul 2013, at 11:00, <comp-phys-alps-users-request(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch>
wrote:
> Send Comp-phys-alps-users mailing list submissions to
> comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.phys.ethz.ch/listinfo/comp-phys-alps-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> comp-phys-alps-…
[View More]users-request(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> comp-phys-alps-users-owner(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Comp-phys-alps-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Possible Measurements in TEBD code (Joseph Prentice)
> 2. Re: Possible Measurements in TEBD code (Michael Wall)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 10:02:01 +0000
> From: Joseph Prentice <Joseph.Prentice(a)physics.ox.ac.uk>
> To: "comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch"
> <comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch>
> Subject: [ALPS-users] Possible Measurements in TEBD code
> Message-ID:
> <747861816F6A5C47BE50FCA07F5B2B4A0DD609(a)EXCHNG16.physics.ox.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm attempting to look at spin correlation functions, both nearest neighbour and next nearest neighbour, near the centre of an XXZ chain that is undergoing a quench using the TEBD code. As far as I can tell from the documentation, these measurements are hardcoded in to the TEBD code, but the documentation gives no clue on how to access them. In effect, what I would like to know is what can I write into the following line of Python (taken from the second TEBD tutorial):
> Data = pyalps.load.loadTimeEvolution(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix='tutorial_2a'), measurements=['Local Magnetization'])
> instead of 'Local Magnetization', in order to obtain the correlation functions, and also how I could then define which sites the correlation function will be calculated using. I think a question similar to this was asked in January, but there was no answer.
>
> Thank you very much in advance!
> Joseph Prentice
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 20:23:15 -0600
> From: Michael Wall <mwall.physics(a)gmail.com>
> To: comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch, Lincoln Carr
> <lcarr(a)mines.edu>, "ebekarog(a)mines.edu" <ebekarog(a)mines.edu>
> Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] Possible Measurements in TEBD code
> Message-ID:
> <CA+DwVMoxud1UCTkCHgGLXYfDDW8V0mZR_ky=B2jA7zR2Ny6S1A(a)mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi Joseph,
>
> Indeed, the measurements are hardcoded in the present version of the code.
> You can determine the syntax of the outputs by looking at one of the
> output *.h5 files. There's too many to list here, so I've attached a
> screenshot. For the correlation functions which are computed, they are
> computed for all pairs of sites i and j and returned as a matrix. Hope
> this helps.
>
> -Michael
> [image: Inline image 1]
>
> Hi all,
>> I'm attempting to look at spin correlation functions, both nearest
>> neighbour and next nearest neighbour, near the centre of an XXZ chain that
>> is undergoing a quench using the TEBD code. As far as I can tell from the
>> documentation, these measurements are hardcoded in to the TEBD code, but
>> the documentation gives no clue on how to access them. In effect, what I
>> would like to know is what can I write into the following line of Python
>> (taken from the second TEBD tutorial):
>> Data =
>> pyalps.load.loadTimeEvolution(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix='tutorial_2a'),
>> measurements=['Local Magnetization'])
>> instead of 'Local Magnetization', in order to obtain the correlation
>> functions, and also how I could then define which sites the correlation
>> function will be calculated using. I think a question similar to this was
>> asked in January, but there was no answer.
>> Thank you very much in advance!
>> Joseph Prentice
>
[View Less]
Hi Joseph,
Indeed, the measurements are hardcoded in the present version of the code.
You can determine the syntax of the outputs by looking at one of the
output *.h5 files. There's too many to list here, so I've attached a
screenshot. For the correlation functions which are computed, they are
computed for all pairs of sites i and j and returned as a matrix. Hope
this helps.
-Michael
[image: Inline image 1]
Hi all,
> I'm attempting to look at spin correlation functions, both nearest
&…
[View More]gt; neighbour and next nearest neighbour, near the centre of an XXZ chain that
> is undergoing a quench using the TEBD code. As far as I can tell from the
> documentation, these measurements are hardcoded in to the TEBD code, but
> the documentation gives no clue on how to access them. In effect, what I
> would like to know is what can I write into the following line of Python
> (taken from the second TEBD tutorial):
> Data =
> pyalps.load.loadTimeEvolution(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix='tutorial_2a'),
> measurements=['Local Magnetization'])
> instead of 'Local Magnetization', in order to obtain the correlation
> functions, and also how I could then define which sites the correlation
> function will be calculated using. I think a question similar to this was
> asked in January, but there was no answer.
> Thank you very much in advance!
> Joseph Prentice
[View Less]
Hi all,
I'm attempting to look at spin correlation functions, both nearest neighbour and next nearest neighbour, near the centre of an XXZ chain that is undergoing a quench using the TEBD code. As far as I can tell from the documentation, these measurements are hardcoded in to the TEBD code, but the documentation gives no clue on how to access them. In effect, what I would like to know is what can I write into the following line of Python (taken from the second TEBD tutorial):
Data = pyalps.…
[View More]load.loadTimeEvolution(pyalps.getResultFiles(prefix='tutorial_2a'), measurements=['Local Magnetization'])
instead of 'Local Magnetization', in order to obtain the correlation functions, and also how I could then define which sites the correlation function will be calculated using. I think a question similar to this was asked in January, but there was no answer.
Thank you very much in advance!
Joseph Prentice
[View Less]
I tried to build both:
alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost
alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost
If that isn't what you mean by "What version of ALPS did you try to
build?" then can you clarify?
On 24/07/13 11:00, comp-phys-alps-users-request(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch wrote:
> Send Comp-phys-alps-users mailing list submissions to
> comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.phys.ethz.ch/listinfo/comp-phys-alps-…
[View More]users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> comp-phys-alps-users-request(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> comp-phys-alps-users-owner(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Comp-phys-alps-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. "forming reference to void" error building ALPS
> (Jonathan Patterson)
> 2. Re: "forming reference to void" error building ALPS
> (Matthias Troyer)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:53:26 +0100
> From: Jonathan Patterson <jop(a)astro.ox.ac.uk>
> To: <comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch>
> Subject: [ALPS-users] "forming reference to void" error building ALPS
> Message-ID: <51EEDF36.5070705(a)astro.ox.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>
>
> Hi!
> Firstly, sorry - I must be doing something wrong, but I can't see what. I've tried
> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost
> alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost
> with gcc 4.1.2, gcc 4.7.2, Intel compilers 11.1
> Each time I get a variation of the following error when compiling:
> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/latticelibrary.C:147:59: required from here
> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/propertymap.h:212:13: error: forming reference to void
> I'm using the following to setup the build. Anyone got any ideas what's going wrong please? Thank you.
>
> ~jop/installed/cmake/cmake-2.8.8/bin/cmake -D FFTW_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/include -D FFTW_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/lib/libfftw3.so.3 -D ALPS_BUILD_FORTRAN=ON -D ALPS_ENABLE_OPENMP=ON -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/shared/alps-2.1.1 -D BLAS_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1-gfortran/libblas.a -D LAPACK_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1/liblapack.a -D PYTHON_INTERPRETER=/usr/local/shared/bin/python27fpic -D CMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc472 -D CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER=gfortran472 -D CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++472 -D HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/include -D HDF5_STATIC_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.a -D HDF5_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.so.7 -D Boost_ROOT_DIR:PATH=/usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost/boost/ /usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:54:52 -0600
> From: Matthias Troyer <troyer(a)phys.ethz.ch>
> To: comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] "forming reference to void" error building
> ALPS
> Message-ID: <94EA1D75-1070-47AB-813E-3EF8443E5F21(a)phys.ethz.ch>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> What version of ALPS do you try to build?
>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Jonathan Patterson <jop(a)astro.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi!
>> Firstly, sorry - I must be doing something wrong, but I can't see what. I've tried
>> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost
>> alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost
>> with gcc 4.1.2, gcc 4.7.2, Intel compilers 11.1
>> Each time I get a variation of the following error when compiling:
>> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/latticelibrary.C:147:59: required from here
>> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/propertymap.h:212:13: error: forming reference to void
>> I'm using the following to setup the build. Anyone got any ideas what's going wrong please? Thank you.
>>
>> ~jop/installed/cmake/cmake-2.8.8/bin/cmake -D FFTW_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/include -D FFTW_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/lib/libfftw3.so.3 -D ALPS_BUILD_FORTRAN=ON -D ALPS_ENABLE_OPENMP=ON -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/shared/alps-2.1.1 -D BLAS_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1-gfortran/libblas.a -D LAPACK_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1/liblapack.a -D PYTHON_INTERPRETER=/usr/local/shared/bin/python27fpic -D CMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc472 -D CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER=gfortran472 -D CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++472 -D HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/include -D HDF5_STATIC_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.a -D HDF5_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.so.7 -D Boost_ROOT_DIR:PATH=/usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost/boost/ /usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/
>>
>
>
>
> End of Comp-phys-alps-users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 8
> ***************************************************
>
[View Less]
I tried to build both:
alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost
alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost
If that isn't what you mean by "What version of ALPS did you try to
build?" then can you clarify?
> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:54:52 -0600
> From: Matthias Troyer <troyer(a)phys.ethz.ch>
> To: comp-phys-alps-users(a)lists.phys.ethz.ch
> Subject: Re: [ALPS-users] "forming reference to void" error building
> ALPS
> Message-ID: <94EA1D75-1070-47AB-813E-3EF8443E5F21(a)phys.ethz.ch…
[View More]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> What version of ALPS do you try to build?
>
> On Jul 23, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Jonathan Patterson <jop(a)astro.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi!
>> Firstly, sorry - I must be doing something wrong, but I can't see what. I've tried
>> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost
>> alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost
>> with gcc 4.1.2, gcc 4.7.2, Intel compilers 11.1
>> Each time I get a variation of the following error when compiling:
>> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/latticelibrary.C:147:59: required from here
>> alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/propertymap.h:212:13: error: forming reference to void
>> I'm using the following to setup the build. Anyone got any ideas what's going wrong please? Thank you.
>>
>> ~jop/installed/cmake/cmake-2.8.8/bin/cmake -D FFTW_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/include -D FFTW_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/lib/libfftw3.so.3 -D ALPS_BUILD_FORTRAN=ON -D ALPS_ENABLE_OPENMP=ON -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/shared/alps-2.1.1 -D BLAS_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1-gfortran/libblas.a -D LAPACK_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1/liblapack.a -D PYTHON_INTERPRETER=/usr/local/shared/bin/python27fpic -D CMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc472 -D CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER=gfortran472 -D CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++472 -D HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/include -D HDF5_STATIC_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.a -D HDF5_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.so.7 -D Boost_ROOT_DIR:PATH=/usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost/boost/ /usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/
>>
>
>
>
> End of Comp-phys-alps-users Digest, Vol 88, Issue 8
> ***************************************************
>
[View Less]
Hi!
Firstly, sorry - I must be doing something wrong, but I can't see what. I've tried
alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost
alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost
with gcc 4.1.2, gcc 4.7.2, Intel compilers 11.1
Each time I get a variation of the following error when compiling:
alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/latticelibrary.C:147:59: required from here
alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/src/alps/lattice/propertymap.h:212:13: error: forming reference to void
I'm using the …
[View More]following to setup the build. Anyone got any ideas what's going wrong please? Thank you.
~jop/installed/cmake/cmake-2.8.8/bin/cmake -D FFTW_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/include -D FFTW_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/fftw3.3.3/lib/libfftw3.so.3 -D ALPS_BUILD_FORTRAN=ON -D ALPS_ENABLE_OPENMP=ON -D CMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local/shared/alps-2.1.1 -D BLAS_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1-gfortran/libblas.a -D LAPACK_LIBRARY=/usr/local/shared/lapack-3.4.1/liblapack.a -D PYTHON_INTERPRETER=/usr/local/shared/bin/python27fpic -D CMAKE_C_COMPILER=gcc472 -D CMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER=gfortran472 -D CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=g++472 -D HDF5_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/include -D HDF5_STATIC_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.a -D HDF5_LIBRARIES=/usr/local/shared/hdf5-1.8.10/lib/libhdf5.so.7 -D Boost_ROOT_DIR:PATH=/usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.2-r6963-src-with-boost/boost/ /usersVol2/jop/installed/alps/alps-2.1.1-r6176-src-with-boost/alps/
[View Less]