Hi all
I am staying at home to not infect anybody while I still have symptoms.
If I get a zoom link I would be able to participate virtually in today's meeting.
Cheers,
Franziska
Unfortunately there is no zoom link today - Felix and Phillipe are away, too. Hence we are very few people and the meeting is going to be very short.
Thanks for your understanding Sascha
On 18 Nov 2024, at 10:02, Franziska fmenti@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Hi all
I am staying at home to not infect anybody while I still have symptoms.
If I get a zoom link I would be able to participate virtually in today's meeting.
Cheers,
Franziska
Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
_____ Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
_____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
OK, can you then decide if on Thursday we have our busy afternoon after the all-hands meeting? Thanks, Andrea
From: Sascha P. Quanz sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch Date: Monday, 18 November 2024 at 10:06 To: Franziska fmenti@phys.ethz.ch Cc: life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch Subject: [Life-eth-intern] Re: zoom link Unfortunately there is no zoom link today - Felix and Phillipe are away, too. Hence we are very few people and the meeting is going to be very short.
Thanks for your understanding Sascha
On 18 Nov 2024, at 10:02, Franziska fmenti@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Hi all
I am staying at home to not infect anybody while I still have symptoms.
If I get a zoom link I would be able to participate virtually in today's meeting.
Cheers,
Franziska
_______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
_____ Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.chmailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.chhttp://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
_____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
Yes, we will spend the afternoon reviewing the proposal work packages, examining their completeness and structure.
Dr. Jonah T. Hansen Postdoctoral Researcher Exoplanets & Habitability Group Institute for Particle Physics & Astrophysics ETH Zurich
On 18/11/2024 10:08 am, andrea.fortier@unibe.ch wrote:
OK, can you then decide if on Thursday we have our busy afternoon after the all-hands meeting?
Thanks,
Andrea
*From: *Sascha P. Quanz sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch *Date: *Monday, 18 November 2024 at 10:06 *To: *Franziska fmenti@phys.ethz.ch *Cc: *life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch *Subject: *[Life-eth-intern] Re: zoom link
Unfortunately there is no zoom link today - Felix and Phillipe are away, too.
Hence we are very few people and the meeting is going to be very short.
Thanks for your understanding
Sascha
On 18 Nov 2024, at 10:02, Franziska <fmenti@phys.ethz.ch> wrote: Hi all I am staying at home to not infect anybody while I still have symptoms. If I get a zoom link I would be able to participate virtually in today's meeting. Cheers, Franziska _______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him)
ETH Zurich
Department of Physics
Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics
Exoplanets & Habitability Group
Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27
Building HIT, Office J 31.8
CH-8093 Zurich
Switzerland
Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830
sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch
www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
/Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working./
Life-eth-intern mailing list --life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email tolife-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
For what it's worth: Andrea and I are waiting in the usual zoom room
LIFE@ETH Zoom Link: https://ethz.zoom.us/j/62233166662
Daniel
On 18.11.2024 10:02, Franziska wrote:
Hi all
I am staying at home to not infect anybody while I still have symptoms.
If I get a zoom link I would be able to participate virtually in today's meeting.
Cheers,
Franziska
Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
--- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me
Dear all,
In preparation of the "Branding input" to the proposal report review I here attach a first preliminary report on the main outcomes.
As discussed before, there is still a lot more (second order) content in the data and we already identified a couple of follow up activities and todos.
To avoid misunderstanding and to manage expectation: we will not "finish the branding" in any way tomorrow. The purpose of the (eventually fully) developed brand is to provide a constant guidance and benchmark for the strategic positioning of the LIFE initiative.
In the context of this busy week: please look at it as an offer that I am providing to give you some more tools, metrics and orientation for the internal review.
Therefore I would suggest that I will give a short presentation (~15 mins plus ~15 mins discussion) tomorrow, preferably right before we start our critical feedback.
My hope is that this will set the tone and provide a clear cut that helps change the mindset from writing to reviewing.
Let me know what you think and see you tomorrow.
Daniel --- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me
Thanks for sharing, Daniel! Very useful.
I just went through your memo and - if ok - would have a few questions - apologies if some of this has been discussed previously. Also, no need to respond here - we can do this tomorrow, but I wanted to share this upfront.
(1) The “Mission” / “Vision” / “Values” paragraphs: are they also a result and summary from the branding exercise? (2) I think an additional target audience could be “Industry”. (3) I do not fully understand Figure 2. Why does Policy Makers appear here, but not in the main text? Also, the What? How? Why? refers to what exactly? The mission? (4) Competitive Landscape: this point came up a few times in the past and I am still confused. In the first sentence you write "both governmental and private initiatives:” but then the list contains only Space Agency (missions). What about, e.g., “Nautilus” or Sara Seager’s Venus missions? And what about things like “SETI Institute” that also seek to attract private funding?
Thanks again and I am looking forward to dive deeper tomorrow! Best
Sascha
On 16 Dec 2024, at 15:06, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Dear all,
In preparation of the "Branding input" to the proposal report review I here attach a first preliminary report on the main outcomes.
As discussed before, there is still a lot more (second order) content in the data and we already identified a couple of follow up activities and todos.
To avoid misunderstanding and to manage expectation: we will not "finish the branding" in any way tomorrow. The purpose of the (eventually fully) developed brand is to provide a constant guidance and benchmark for the strategic positioning of the LIFE initiative.
In the context of this busy week: please look at it as an offer that I am providing to give you some more tools, metrics and orientation for the internal review.
Therefore I would suggest that I will give a short presentation (~15 mins plus ~15 mins discussion) tomorrow, preferably right before we start our critical feedback.
My hope is that this will set the tone and provide a clear cut that helps change the mindset from writing to reviewing.
Let me know what you think and see you tomorrow.
Daniel
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me<LIFE_brand_sprint_prelim_results.pdf>_______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
_____ Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
_____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
Ok, sure.
Then I would suggest to maybe add 10 mins to the agenda (or briefly talk 1:1 with Sascha) to bring everyone (back) up to speed wrt this exercise.
The short answer is: if it was (not) in any of the answers it is (not) in this report, as I did not want to bias it with information that did not come out of this exercise. But it could be that missing items were just 4/5 on the list when I focused on the top3 or so.
See you in a bit (currently stuck halfway on the tracks so it could be after 10:00), Daniel
On 16.12.2024 15:58, Sascha P. Quanz wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Daniel! Very useful.
I just went through your memo and - if ok - would have a few questions
- apologies if some of this has been discussed previously.
Also, no need to respond here - we can do this tomorrow, but I wanted to share this upfront.
(1) The “Mission” / “Vision” / “Values” paragraphs: are they also a result and summary from the branding exercise? (2) I think an additional target audience could be “Industry”. (3) I do not fully understand Figure 2. Why does Policy Makers appear here, but not in the main text? Also, the What? How? Why? refers to what exactly? The mission? (4) Competitive Landscape: this point came up a few times in the past and I am still confused. In the first sentence you write "both governmental and private initiatives:” but then the list contains only Space Agency (missions). What about, e.g., “Nautilus” or Sara Seager’s Venus missions? And what about things like “SETI Institute” that also seek to attract private funding?
Thanks again and I am looking forward to dive deeper tomorrow! Best
Sascha
On 16 Dec 2024, at 15:06, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Dear all,
In preparation of the "Branding input" to the proposal report review I here attach a first preliminary report on the main outcomes.
As discussed before, there is still a lot more (second order) content in the data and we already identified a couple of follow up activities and todos.
To avoid misunderstanding and to manage expectation: we will not "finish the branding" in any way tomorrow. The purpose of the (eventually fully) developed brand is to provide a constant guidance and benchmark for the strategic positioning of the LIFE initiative.
In the context of this busy week: please look at it as an offer that I am providing to give you some more tools, metrics and orientation for the internal review.
Therefore I would suggest that I will give a short presentation (~15 mins plus ~15 mins discussion) tomorrow, preferably right before we start our critical feedback.
My hope is that this will set the tone and provide a clear cut that helps change the mindset from writing to reviewing.
Let me know what you think and see you tomorrow.
Daniel
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me<LIFE_brand_sprint_prelim_results.pdf>_______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
--- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me
Here is the link to (a copy of) the slides:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15w-awkI6cCSudeB9tjyOGzxdFXpzj8qRQy3T...
Cheers, Daniel
On 17.12.2024 08:58, Daniel Angerhausen wrote:
Ok, sure.
Then I would suggest to maybe add 10 mins to the agenda (or briefly talk 1:1 with Sascha) to bring everyone (back) up to speed wrt this exercise.
The short answer is: if it was (not) in any of the answers it is (not) in this report, as I did not want to bias it with information that did not come out of this exercise. But it could be that missing items were just 4/5 on the list when I focused on the top3 or so.
See you in a bit (currently stuck halfway on the tracks so it could be after 10:00), Daniel
On 16.12.2024 15:58, Sascha P. Quanz wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Daniel! Very useful.
I just went through your memo and - if ok - would have a few questions
- apologies if some of this has been discussed previously.
Also, no need to respond here - we can do this tomorrow, but I wanted to share this upfront.
(1) The “Mission” / “Vision” / “Values” paragraphs: are they also a result and summary from the branding exercise? (2) I think an additional target audience could be “Industry”. (3) I do not fully understand Figure 2. Why does Policy Makers appear here, but not in the main text? Also, the What? How? Why? refers to what exactly? The mission? (4) Competitive Landscape: this point came up a few times in the past and I am still confused. In the first sentence you write "both governmental and private initiatives:” but then the list contains only Space Agency (missions). What about, e.g., “Nautilus” or Sara Seager’s Venus missions? And what about things like “SETI Institute” that also seek to attract private funding?
Thanks again and I am looking forward to dive deeper tomorrow! Best
Sascha
On 16 Dec 2024, at 15:06, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Dear all,
In preparation of the "Branding input" to the proposal report review I here attach a first preliminary report on the main outcomes.
As discussed before, there is still a lot more (second order) content in the data and we already identified a couple of follow up activities and todos.
To avoid misunderstanding and to manage expectation: we will not "finish the branding" in any way tomorrow. The purpose of the (eventually fully) developed brand is to provide a constant guidance and benchmark for the strategic positioning of the LIFE initiative.
In the context of this busy week: please look at it as an offer that I am providing to give you some more tools, metrics and orientation for the internal review.
Therefore I would suggest that I will give a short presentation (~15 mins plus ~15 mins discussion) tomorrow, preferably right before we start our critical feedback.
My hope is that this will set the tone and provide a clear cut that helps change the mindset from writing to reviewing.
Let me know what you think and see you tomorrow.
Daniel
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me<LIFE_brand_sprint_prelim_results.pdf>_______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me _______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
--- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me
Dear all,
due to some “family situation” I will again need to work from home today - sorry about that; was not the plan. Will be back in the COPL room tomorrow. Looking at the document, I was wondering whether instead of starting with reviewing we should try another push to move some of the somewhat less ready chapters forward. Maybe a review makes most sense with a somewhat complete document (to also check for coherence and consistency - as discussed). My goal is still to put something in chapter 1 (and give chapter 2 a first read); please organize yourself for the other chapters.
As for tomorrow: I would suggest that all of us available meet at 15h in the COPL room for some debrief and outlook - the more the merrier.
Thanks Sascha
On 17 Dec 2024, at 13:46, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Here is the link to (a copy of) the slides:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15w-awkI6cCSudeB9tjyOGzxdFXpzj8qRQy3T...
Cheers, Daniel
On 17.12.2024 08:58, Daniel Angerhausen wrote:
Ok, sure. Then I would suggest to maybe add 10 mins to the agenda (or briefly talk 1:1 with Sascha) to bring everyone (back) up to speed wrt this exercise. The short answer is: if it was (not) in any of the answers it is (not) in this report, as I did not want to bias it with information that did not come out of this exercise. But it could be that missing items were just 4/5 on the list when I focused on the top3 or so. See you in a bit (currently stuck halfway on the tracks so it could be after 10:00), Daniel On 16.12.2024 15:58, Sascha P. Quanz wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Daniel! Very useful. I just went through your memo and - if ok - would have a few questions - apologies if some of this has been discussed previously. Also, no need to respond here - we can do this tomorrow, but I wanted to share this upfront. (1) The “Mission” / “Vision” / “Values” paragraphs: are they also a result and summary from the branding exercise? (2) I think an additional target audience could be “Industry”. (3) I do not fully understand Figure 2. Why does Policy Makers appear here, but not in the main text? Also, the What? How? Why? refers to what exactly? The mission? (4) Competitive Landscape: this point came up a few times in the past and I am still confused. In the first sentence you write "both governmental and private initiatives:” but then the list contains only Space Agency (missions). What about, e.g., “Nautilus” or Sara Seager’s Venus missions? And what about things like “SETI Institute” that also seek to attract private funding? Thanks again and I am looking forward to dive deeper tomorrow! Best Sascha
On 16 Dec 2024, at 15:06, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote: Dear all, In preparation of the "Branding input" to the proposal report review I here attach a first preliminary report on the main outcomes. As discussed before, there is still a lot more (second order) content in the data and we already identified a couple of follow up activities and todos. To avoid misunderstanding and to manage expectation: we will not "finish the branding" in any way tomorrow. The purpose of the (eventually fully) developed brand is to provide a constant guidance and benchmark for the strategic positioning of the LIFE initiative. In the context of this busy week: please look at it as an offer that I am providing to give you some more tools, metrics and orientation for the internal review. Therefore I would suggest that I will give a short presentation (~15 mins plus ~15 mins discussion) tomorrow, preferably right before we start our critical feedback. My hope is that this will set the tone and provide a clear cut that helps change the mindset from writing to reviewing. Let me know what you think and see you tomorrow. Daniel
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me<LIFE_brand_sprint_prelim_results.pdf>_______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/ _____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working. _______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me _______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me
_____ Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
_____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
Dear all, Jonah and I are in the COPL room. I propose that those interested in joining the Team 3 meeting at 11:00 come to the COPL room and we join all from here. See you! Andrea
From: Sascha P. Quanz sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch Date: Wednesday, 18 December 2024 at 07:33 To: life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch Subject: [Life-eth-intern] LIFE busy days - final 2 days Dear all,
due to some “family situation” I will again need to work from home today - sorry about that; was not the plan. Will be back in the COPL room tomorrow. Looking at the document, I was wondering whether instead of starting with reviewing we should try another push to move some of the somewhat less ready chapters forward. Maybe a review makes most sense with a somewhat complete document (to also check for coherence and consistency - as discussed). My goal is still to put something in chapter 1 (and give chapter 2 a first read); please organize yourself for the other chapters.
As for tomorrow: I would suggest that all of us available meet at 15h in the COPL room for some debrief and outlook - the more the merrier.
Thanks Sascha
On 17 Dec 2024, at 13:46, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote:
Here is the link to (a copy of) the slides:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/15w-awkI6cCSudeB9tjyOGzxdFXpzj8qRQy3T...
Cheers, Daniel
On 17.12.2024 08:58, Daniel Angerhausen wrote:
Ok, sure. Then I would suggest to maybe add 10 mins to the agenda (or briefly talk 1:1 with Sascha) to bring everyone (back) up to speed wrt this exercise. The short answer is: if it was (not) in any of the answers it is (not) in this report, as I did not want to bias it with information that did not come out of this exercise. But it could be that missing items were just 4/5 on the list when I focused on the top3 or so. See you in a bit (currently stuck halfway on the tracks so it could be after 10:00), Daniel On 16.12.2024 15:58, Sascha P. Quanz wrote:
Thanks for sharing, Daniel! Very useful. I just went through your memo and - if ok - would have a few questions - apologies if some of this has been discussed previously. Also, no need to respond here - we can do this tomorrow, but I wanted to share this upfront. (1) The “Mission” / “Vision” / “Values” paragraphs: are they also a result and summary from the branding exercise? (2) I think an additional target audience could be “Industry”. (3) I do not fully understand Figure 2. Why does Policy Makers appear here, but not in the main text? Also, the What? How? Why? refers to what exactly? The mission? (4) Competitive Landscape: this point came up a few times in the past and I am still confused. In the first sentence you write "both governmental and private initiatives:” but then the list contains only Space Agency (missions). What about, e.g., “Nautilus” or Sara Seager’s Venus missions? And what about things like “SETI Institute” that also seek to attract private funding? Thanks again and I am looking forward to dive deeper tomorrow! Best Sascha
On 16 Dec 2024, at 15:06, Daniel Angerhausen dangerhau@phys.ethz.ch wrote: Dear all, In preparation of the "Branding input" to the proposal report review I here attach a first preliminary report on the main outcomes. As discussed before, there is still a lot more (second order) content in the data and we already identified a couple of follow up activities and todos. To avoid misunderstanding and to manage expectation: we will not "finish the branding" in any way tomorrow. The purpose of the (eventually fully) developed brand is to provide a constant guidance and benchmark for the strategic positioning of the LIFE initiative. In the context of this busy week: please look at it as an offer that I am providing to give you some more tools, metrics and orientation for the internal review. Therefore I would suggest that I will give a short presentation (~15 mins plus ~15 mins discussion) tomorrow, preferably right before we start our critical feedback. My hope is that this will set the tone and provide a clear cut that helps change the mindset from writing to reviewing. Let me know what you think and see you tomorrow. Daniel --- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me<LIFE_brand_sprint_prelim_results.pdf>_______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch _____ Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch mailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.ch http://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/ _____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working. _______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch --- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me _______________________________________________ Life-eth-intern mailing list -- life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch To unsubscribe send an email to life-eth-intern-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch
--- Dr. Daniel Angerhausen Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets and Habitability Group | ETH Zurich www.dananger.me
_____ Prof. Sascha P. Quanz (he/him) ETH Zurich Department of Physics Institute for Particle Physics and Astrophysics Exoplanets & Habitability Group Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 27 Building HIT, Office J 31.8 CH-8093 Zurich Switzerland Phone: +41 (0)44 63 32830 sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.chmailto:sascha.quanz@phys.ethz.ch www.quanz-group.ethz.chhttp://www.quanz-group.ethz.ch/
_____ Due to my own family/work balance, you may receive emails from me outside of normal working hours. I do not expect a response from you outside of your own working pattern, nor do I expect an immediate response when you are working.
Hi to those who write work packages in the proposal
As I am running out of time in order to prepare for the discussion this afternoon, could you please help me by copying the work packages from your chapters into a new MIRO board that I just shared with you? I started it for 3 work-packages.
The idea is that we review them and connect them in terms of dependencies. I hope this doesn;t give you too much work.
https://miro.com/app/board/uXjVLBjJ1RY=/?share_link_id=674372342798%EF%BF%BC Sign up | Miro | The Visual Workspace for Innovation miro.com
Thanks a lot Adrian
life-eth-intern@lists.phys.ethz.ch