Dear all,
As announced, we are hosting a tutorial on shape dynamics (a
relational approach to quantum gravity) on Thursday at 4pm.
Best,
Lídia
--
Henrique Gomes, University of Oxford
A brief tutorial in geometrodynamics in general and shape dynamics in particular
Thursday, 13th of June, HIL E5
A recurring theme in the obstacles we face on our way to quantum
gravity --- placed at the intersection between the conceptual and
technical categories --- is Time, with a capital T. In quantum
mechanics, an absolute evolution in time is an essential
ingredient. Time flows from past to future, and with it, one
instantaneous quantum state is brought to another. In general
relativity, Time is a dynamical concept, with no absolute notion
of past and future. One instant is given by the value of an
arbitrary label, with no physical meaning. Conflict ensues when
quantization is applied to space-time itself.
In the words of two icons of the field, R. Wald and W. Unruh:
"In quantum mechanics, all measurements are made at
"instants of time"; only quantities referring to the
instantaneous state of a system have physical meaning. In
particular, "histories" are unmeasurable in quantum theory. On
the other hand, in general relativity "time" is merely an
arbitrary label [...]. The physically meaningful quantities must
be independent of such labels [...]. In other words, only the
spacetime geometry is measurable; i.e., only histories have
physical meaning. Thus, it should not be surprising that when
one naively combines quantum theory and general relativity, the
only meaningful quantities which survive are those which are
both instantaneously measurable [...] and yet depend only on the
spacetime geometry [...]".
This is certainly confusing at a conceptual level. After all, we
believe quantum evolution in time amounts to a transformation
between physically distinct states, whereas in gravity different
instants would be associated with the same physical state.
In these tutorials, I will introduce the geometrodynamical
approach to general relativity, with a special emphasis on the
role played by time. I will then describe the theory of shape
dynamics. Shape dynamics amounts to taking many hints ---coming
from the initial value formulation of general relativity and from
the consideration of symmetries compatible with a quantum
mechanical evolution between instantaneous physical configuration
states--- seriously. It does this by considering dynamical systems
whose natural configuration space is not the space of spacetime
geometries, but that of conformally invariant spatial geometries:
conformal superspace. Such a configuration space embodies natural
tenets of relationalism (with respect to size and location). By
using shape dynamics, we trade Lorentz invariance (or refoliation
invariance), by spatial scale invariance and a spatially non-local
Hamiltonian. Such characteristics may render shape dynamics more
congenial to the Bohmian interpretation of quantum mechanics than
other geometrodynamical theories.