Re: [ALPS-users] Comp-phys-alps-users Digest, Vol 77, Issue 5
I'm calculating the one particle reduced density matrix, so it's the cdag_up:c_up, and cdag_down:c_down. 2012/8/30 <comp-phys-alps-users-request@lists.phys.ethz.ch>
Send Comp-phys-alps-users mailing list submissions to comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.phys.ethz.ch/listinfo/comp-phys-alps-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to comp-phys-alps-users-request@lists.phys.ethz.ch
You can reach the person managing the list at comp-phys-alps-users-owner@lists.phys.ethz.ch
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Comp-phys-alps-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. using sparsediag (???) 2. Re: using sparsediag (Matthias Troyer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:35:13 -0400 From: ??? <qiaoni2233@gmail.com> To: comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch Subject: [ALPS-users] using sparsediag Message-ID: <CAEM5Jm67=pHMzhVxKwZuPKFJjiNpw8A3+LSSa3hG0MJ9zEAC= Q@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi, everyone I'm using sparsediag to get the ground state of Hubbard model, e.g. L=12, with the particle number constraint Nup_total=6, Ndown_total=6. Using the command line. If I calculate the correlation function , it takes 900 sec, if not it takes 100 sec, does anyone know how to speed up this calculation?
Btw if I use python to run the result, I can't see the result from the task.out.xml file, how to look up the result
-- Qiaoni Chen Department of Chemistry, Princeton University Princeton, NJ, 08544 Tel +1-609-865-0817
Writing the result of correlation function to XML file takes a lot of time. 2012/8/30 陈巧妮 <qiaoni2233@gmail.com>
I'm calculating the one particle reduced density matrix, so it's the cdag_up:c_up, and cdag_down:c_down.
2012/8/30 <comp-phys-alps-users-request@lists.phys.ethz.ch>
Send Comp-phys-alps-users mailing list submissions to
comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.phys.ethz.ch/listinfo/comp-phys-alps-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to comp-phys-alps-users-request@lists.phys.ethz.ch
You can reach the person managing the list at comp-phys-alps-users-owner@lists.phys.ethz.ch
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Comp-phys-alps-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. using sparsediag (???) 2. Re: using sparsediag (Matthias Troyer)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 21:35:13 -0400 From: ??? <qiaoni2233@gmail.com> To: comp-phys-alps-users@lists.phys.ethz.ch Subject: [ALPS-users] using sparsediag Message-ID: <CAEM5Jm67=pHMzhVxKwZuPKFJjiNpw8A3+LSSa3hG0MJ9zEAC= Q@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Hi, everyone I'm using sparsediag to get the ground state of Hubbard model, e.g. L=12, with the particle number constraint Nup_total=6, Ndown_total=6. Using the command line. If I calculate the correlation function , it takes 900 sec, if not it takes 100 sec, does anyone know how to speed up this calculation?
Btw if I use python to run the result, I can't see the result from the task.out.xml file, how to look up the result
-- Qiaoni Chen Department of Chemistry, Princeton University Princeton, NJ, 08544 Tel +1-609-865-0817
participants (1)
-
陈巧妮