Re: [ALPS-users] ALPS linux binary packages in repositories?
Dear Prof. Troyer, On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Troyer <troyer@phys.ethz.ch> wrote:
Regarding lp_solve, we are testing an ALPS replacement for it, so that user do not need to download it in the future.
Is implementing own Linear Programming solver easier than updating to lp_solve 5.5? Since Debian/Ubuntu/RHEL all have official lp_solve package (5.5), updating should be enough from the packaging purpose. (See #68 on trac). Best regards, -- Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D. rigarash@hosi.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OpenPGP fingerprint: BAD9 71E3 28F3 8952 5640 6A53 EC79 A280 6A19 2319
Yes, since this is always causing problems for the users. While some Linux distributions have nice packages not all do. On 30.11.2010, at 07:18, Ryo IGARASHI <rigarash@hosi.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> wrote:
Dear Prof. Troyer,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Matthias Troyer <troyer@phys.ethz.ch> wrote:
Regarding lp_solve, we are testing an ALPS replacement for it, so that user do not need to download it in the future.
Is implementing own Linear Programming solver easier than updating to lp_solve 5.5? Since Debian/Ubuntu/RHEL all have official lp_solve package (5.5), updating should be enough from the packaging purpose. (See #68 on trac).
Best regards, -- Ryo IGARASHI, Ph.D. rigarash@hosi.phys.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp OpenPGP fingerprint: BAD9 71E3 28F3 8952 5640 6A53 EC79 A280 6A19 2319
participants (2)
-
Matthias Troyer
-
Ryo IGARASHI