On 17 Jan 2017, at 08:54, Michele Dolfi <dolfim@phys.ethz.ch> wrote:I hope somebody else could give you a better answer, but I don’t think this is possible out of the box, and I’m not 100% sure it is at all possible in the way you think about it.What I would try is away to play around with a new model definition where you make a composite quantum number explicit.The "fermion Hubbard” and “alternative fermion Hubbard” could be of inspiration for how to conserve N and/or Sz instead of Nup and/or Ndown.Best,Michele--ETH ZurichDr. Michele DolfiInstitute for Theoretical PhysicsHIT G 32.4Wolfgang-Pauli-Str. 278093 ZurichSwitzerland+41 44 633 78 56 phone+41 44 633 11 15 fax
On Jan 17, 2017, at 4:10 PM, Axel Gagge <axel.gagge@fysik.su.se> wrote:Hello, I just wanted to ask if it is possible to preserve a combination of quantum numbers such as the total number of excitations:N = \sum_{bosonic sites} n_j + 1/2 \sum_{spinful sites} s_zand what the syntax for this would be? I guess that one option would be to define a new quantum number and let Splus raise it by 1/2 but I just thought that I would check this with you first!Otherwise, thank you for an excellent library! I have had no problems so far with the new release.Thanks,/Axel GaggeFirst year PhD Student, Stockholm University
----
Comp-phys-alps-users Mailing List for the ALPS Project
http://alps.comp-phys.org/
List info: https://lists.phys.ethz.ch//listinfo/comp-phys-alps-users
Archive: https://lists.phys.ethz.ch//pipermail/comp-phys-alps-users
Unsubscribe by writing a mail to comp-phys-alps-users-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch.
----
Comp-phys-alps-users Mailing List for the ALPS Project
http://alps.comp-phys.org/
List info: https://lists.phys.ethz.ch//listinfo/comp-phys-alps-users
Archive: https://lists.phys.ethz.ch//pipermail/comp-phys-alps-users
Unsubscribe by writing a mail to comp-phys-alps-users-leave@lists.phys.ethz.ch.